by agentcathq · MCP Server · ★ 127
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 127 |
| Forks | 18 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 70/100 |
| Open Issues | 5 |
| Last Updated | 2026-11-03 |
| Created | 2025-05-29 |
| Platforms | mcp, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~16k |
Getting Started · Features · Docs · Website · Open Source · Schedule a Demo [!IMPO
These tools work well together with agentcat-typescript-sdk for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a agentcat-typescript-sdk alternative? If you're comparing agentcat-typescript-sdk with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
MCPcat is an analytics platform for MCP server owners 🐱.
Create agentic AI workflows in ROBLOX Studio
CAIPE is an open-source AI platform for building, governing, and operating AI agents and agentic workflows for
🌋 Build AI agents that seamlessly combine LLM reasoning with real-world actions via MCP tools — in just a few
Open source version of Claude Managed Agents. Fastest way to build and deploy reliable AI agents, MCP tools an
Open-source MCP gateway and control plane for teams to govern which tools agents can use, what they can do, an
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: