by allebee · LLM Plugin · ★ 8
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 8 |
| Forks | 1 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | LLM Plugin |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 68/100 |
| Open Issues | 1 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-21 |
| Created | 2026-09-21 |
| Platforms | python |
| Est. Tokens | ~16k |
Pytest plugin for semantic assertions on LLM output using Jev's calibrated probabilities.
Looking for a pytest-jev alternative? If you're comparing pytest-jev with other llm plugin tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Ask your house a question, get a number back. Home Assistant integration for TypeSafe Jev: typed answers as se
🔥🔥 Papers, open reproductions and independent evaluations behind System One models and Jev.
A simple GPT-based evaluation tool for multi-aspect, interpretable assessment of LLMs.
🦾 A production‑ready research outreach AI agent that plans, discovers, reasons, uses tools, auto‑builds cited
🪈 Intelligent orchestration system that coordinates multiple AI coding assistants (Claude, Codex, Gemini CLI,
It is a comprehensive resource hub compiling all LLM papers accepted at the International Conference on Learni
Explore other popular llm plugin tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: