by antoinebou12 · MCP Server · ★ 108
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
git clone https://github.com/antoinebou12/uml-mcp.git && cd uml-mcp
/plugin marketplace add https://github.com/antoinebou12/uml-mcp
Taken from the project's README on GitHub. Check the security audit before running it.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 108 |
| Forks | 29 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 79/100 |
| Open Issues | 1 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-24 |
| Created | 2025-04-01 |
| Platforms | mcp, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~15k |
UML-MCP: Diagram Generation via MCP Generate UML and other diagrams through the Model Context Protocol. At a glance , , lis
These tools work well together with uml-mcp for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a uml-mcp alternative? If you're comparing uml-mcp with other mcp server tools, these 3 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Turn requirements into UML diagrams, test cases and editable Word specs—with traceability. Self-hosted, bring
Generate evidence-grounded interactive software diagrams with offline HTML, SVG and PNG export.
PlantUML diagrams (.puml) from natural language via Kroki — no Java install. 10+ UML types, 5 themes, PNG/SVG,
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: