magpie — security grade SAFE, quality 56/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 56/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by apache · Agent Tool · ★ 96

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is magpie safe to install? View the security audit →

About magpie

Table of Contents generated with DocToc Apache Magpie How adoption works Adopting the framework Bootstrap (copy-pasteable shell) Skill takeover Subsequent contributors Drift detection Skill families Maintenance Cross-references Apache Magpie A reusable, project-agnostic framework for ASF-project automation. Currently in development for ASF projects + Python Core team friendlies. Not a public marketplace skill — adoption is by invitation while the framework is pre-release; once we ship via the ASF release policy, the marketplace path opens up. See release-distribution for the canonical distribution mechanism we will adopt. [!IMPORTANT] The motivation, scope, and design commitments behind this work live in [MISSIO

agent-skillsapacheautomationclaude-codecvesecurityvulnerability-disclosurevulnerability-management

Quick Facts

Stars96
Forks92
LanguagePython
CategoryAgent Tool
LicenseApache-2.0
Quality Score56.2285814046309/100
Open Issues41
Last Updated2026-09-20
Created2026-04-28
Platformsclaude-code, python
Est. Tokens~15k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with magpie for enhanced workflows:

  • lakevision — semantic(0.17)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (60%)

magpie alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a magpie alternative? If you're comparing magpie with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • vulnometry by san3ncrypt3d · ⭐ 56

    Measure what a vulnerability is worth to your business, not how severe it is in the abstract. Business Exposur

  • mcp-ssh-manager by bvisible · ⭐ 467

    MCP SSH Server: 37 tools for remote SSH management | Claude Code & OpenAI Codex | DevOps automation, backups,

  • ai-skills by sanjay3290 · ⭐ 422

    24 cross-platform agent skills for Claude Code, Cursor, Codex & Gemini CLI — databases, messaging, research, T

  • daymon by daymonio · ⭐ 368

    Daymon puts your favorite AI to work 24/7. It schedules, remembers, and orchestrates your own virtual team. Fr

  • mcp-odoo by tuanle96 · ⭐ 366

    Odoo MCP for AI agents — 41 tools, gated writes, multi-instance. Free hosted: ERPipe → mcp.erpipe.com

  • sudocode by sudocode-ai · ⭐ 290

    Lightweight agent orchestration dev tool that lives in your repo

More Agent Tool Tools

Explore other popular agent tool tools:

View all Agent Tool tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is magpie?

magpie is Agent-assisted maintainership and development framework for Apache projects — Triage, Mentoring, Drafting (agent-authored fixes with human review), and Pairing (developer-side dev-cycle) skills shippi. It is categorized as a Agent Tool with 96 GitHub stars.

What programming language is magpie written in?

magpie is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as agent-skills, apache, automation.

How do I install or use magpie?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the magpie GitHub repository at github.com/apache/magpie. The project has 96 stars and 92 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does magpie use?

magpie is released under the Apache-2.0 license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to magpie?

The top alternatives to magpie on Agent Skills Hub include vulnometry, mcp-ssh-manager, ai-skills. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Agent Tool tools