by apify · MCP Server · ★ 76
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
Index of all Model Context Protocol (MCP) clients and their capabilities
| Stars | 76 |
| Forks | 8 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 46.2/100 |
| Open Issues | 9 |
| Last Updated | 2026-05-19 |
| Created | 2025-08-26 |
| Platforms | cli, mcp, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~6k |
These tools work well together with mcp-client-capabilities for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a mcp-client-capabilities alternative? If you're comparing mcp-client-capabilities with other mcp server tools, these 5 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Dynamically expose tools from proxied servers based on an Agent Persona
MCPSharp is a .NET library that helps you build Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers and clients - the standar
MCP Client as an Agent Strategy Plugin. Support GUI operation via UI-TARS-SDK.
Remote MCP Server that securely connects Enterprise context with your LLM, IDE, or agent platform of choice.
Model Context Protocol (MCP) Server for Graphlit Platform
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
mcp-client-capabilities is Index of all Model Context Protocol (MCP) clients and their capabilities. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 76 GitHub stars.
mcp-client-capabilities is primarily written in TypeScript. It covers topics such as mcp, mcp-clients, model-context-protocol.
You can find installation instructions and usage details in the mcp-client-capabilities GitHub repository at github.com/apify/mcp-client-capabilities. The project has 76 stars and 8 forks, indicating an active community.
mcp-client-capabilities is released under the Apache-2.0 license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.
The top alternatives to mcp-client-capabilities on Agent Skills Hub include hypertool-mcp, MCPSharp, dify-mcp-client. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.