hermes-video-editing — security grade CAUTION, quality 64/100

Security audit verdict: CAUTION · quality 64/100

Flagged: sudo usage. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by argus-metis · Codex Skill · ★ 5

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is hermes-video-editing safe to install? View the security audit →

About hermes-video-editing

Professional video editing skill for Hermes Agent — AI captioning, silence removal, scene detection, stabilisation, smart reframing, and more. All free and open source.

Quick Facts

Stars5
Forks0
LanguagePython
CategoryCodex Skill
LicenseMIT
Quality Score63.9101534709598/100
Last Updated2026-04-12
Created2026-04-12
Platformspython
Est. Tokens~8k

More Codex Skill Tools

Explore other popular codex skill tools:

View all Codex Skill tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is hermes-video-editing?

hermes-video-editing is Professional video editing skill for Hermes Agent — AI captioning, silence removal, scene detection, stabilisation, smart reframing, and more. All free and open source.. It is categorized as a Codex Skill with 5 GitHub stars.

What programming language is hermes-video-editing written in?

hermes-video-editing is primarily written in Python.

How do I install or use hermes-video-editing?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the hermes-video-editing GitHub repository at github.com/argus-metis/hermes-video-editing. The project has 5 stars and 0 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does hermes-video-editing use?

hermes-video-editing is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Codex Skill tools