by ariel-frischer · LLM Plugin · ★ 5
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 5 |
| Forks | 1 |
| Language | Rust |
| Category | LLM Plugin |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 73/100 |
| Open Issues | 7 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-16 |
| Created | 2026-09-18 |
| Platforms | cli, rust |
| Est. Tokens | ~25k |
Fast Rust CLI for TypeSafe Jev: typed decisions, offline linting before you pay
Looking for a jevkit alternative? If you're comparing jevkit with other llm plugin tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Open-source alternative to TypeSafe's Jev: a System One style model layer that gives typed, calibrated decisio
An unofficial local visualizer for Jev (TypeSafe): a live view of every call your code makes. Not affiliated w
Ask your house a question, get a number back. Home Assistant integration for TypeSafe Jev: typed answers as se
Local proxy that learns your app's typed LLM decisions and answers them with a Laya head. Jev and OpenAI compa
The code quality toolkit for the agentic AI era. Find dead code, clones, and scaffolding across 15 languages.
🔥🔥 Papers, open reproductions and independent evaluations behind System One models and Jev.
Explore other popular llm plugin tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: