by atria-asi · LLM Plugin · ★ 473
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
Atria-Dawn-Preview is a llm plugin by atria-asi.
| Stars | 473 |
| Forks | 23 |
| Category | LLM Plugin |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 42.2837078799396/100 |
| Open Issues | 2 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-18 |
| Created | 2026-09-12 |
| Est. Tokens | ~15k |
Looking for a Atria-Dawn-Preview alternative? If you're comparing Atria-Dawn-Preview with other llm plugin tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
[ICML 2024] LLMCompiler: An LLM Compiler for Parallel Function Calling
Official Repo for ICML 2024 paper "Executable Code Actions Elicit Better LLM Agents" by Xingyao Wang, Yangyi C
Shell and coding agent on mcp clients
The llama-cpp-agent framework is a tool designed for easy interaction with Large Language Models (LLMs). Allow
Design, conduct and analyze results of AI-powered surveys and experiments. Simulate social science and market
A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for ATLAS, a Neo4j-powered task management system for LLM Agents - imple
Explore other popular llm plugin tools:
Atria-Dawn-Preview is an open-source llm plugin by atria-asi with 473 GitHub stars.
You can find installation instructions and usage details in the Atria-Dawn-Preview GitHub repository at github.com/atria-asi/Atria-Dawn-Preview. The project has 473 stars and 23 forks, indicating an active community.
Atria-Dawn-Preview is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.
The top alternatives to Atria-Dawn-Preview on Agent Skills Hub include LLMCompiler, code-act, wcgw. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: