by av · MCP Server · ★ 3.3k
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 3,258 |
| Forks | 233 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 61/100 |
| Open Issues | 3 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-31 |
| Created | 2024-07-27 |
| Platforms | cli, docker, mcp, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~20k |
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e4897391-c5a8-4391-93c3-9f8b76155f11...
Looking for a harbor alternative? If you're comparing harbor with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Bytebot is a self-hosted AI desktop agent that automates computer tasks through natural language commands, ope
CLI MCP package manager & registry for all platforms and all clients. Search & configure MCP servers. Advanced
TalkToFigma: MCP integration between AI Agent (Cursor, Claude Code, Codex) and Figma, allowing Agentic AI to c
A full-stack AI Red Teaming platform securing AI ecosystems via OpenClaw Security Scan, Agent Scan, Skills Sca
Emdash is the Open-Source Agentic Development Environment (🧡 YC W26). Run multiple coding agents in parallel.
ACI.dev is the open source tool-calling platform that hooks up 600+ tools into any agentic IDE or custom AI ag
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: