by barleviatias · MCP Server · ★ 12
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 12 |
| Forks | 7 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 78/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-28 |
| Created | 2026-04-02 |
| Platforms | claude-code, cli, codex, mcp, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~22k |
Package manager for AI coding assistants — manage skills, agents & MCPs across Claude Code, Codex, Copilot, and Cursor
Looking for a toolkit-ai alternative? If you're comparing toolkit-ai with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
🏛 [UNDER CONSTRUCTION] A (roman) claude plugin marketplace
Governance gateway for AI agents — bounded, auditable, session-aware control with MCP proxy, shell proxy & HTT
Define intent once. Photon turns a single TypeScript file into CLI tools, MCP servers, and web interfaces.
CLI-first MCP server for composer-based Kirby CMS projects — inspect blueprints/templates/plugins, interact wi
Rules and instructions for agentic coding tools like Cursor, Claude CLI, Gemini CLI, Qodo, Cline and more
Automatic context preservation for Claude Code. Never lose work to compaction again. 7 hooks, 187 semantic pat
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: