FableCodex — security grade SAFE, quality 76/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 76/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by baskduf · Codex Skill · ★ 436

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is FableCodex safe to install? View the security audit →

About FableCodex

FableCodex Evidence-based workflow gates for Codex. English | 한국어 | 日本語 | 简体中文 | 繁體中文(台灣) FableCodex is a Codex plugin that adds Fable-inspired operating habits to Codex work: inspect first, track goals, record evidence, close review findings, and verify before claiming completion. It is useful when the cost of a missed step is higher than the cost of a little process. FableCodex does not clone, unlock, or replace the Fable 5 model. It cannot change model weights, context length, training, or hidden safety systems.

codexcontext-engineeringfable-5prompt-engineeringskillsworkflow

Quick Facts

Stars436
Forks53
LanguagePython
CategoryCodex Skill
LicenseAGPL-3.0
Quality Score76.2502458581048/100
Open Issues9
Last Updated2026-07-26
Created2026-06-14
Platformscodex, python
Est. Tokens~15k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with FableCodex for enhanced workflows:

  • not-fade-away — semantic(0.29)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (60%)

FableCodex alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a FableCodex alternative? If you're comparing FableCodex with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • claude-workflow-v2 by CloudAI-X · ⭐ 1.4k

    Universal Claude Code workflow plugin with agents, skills, hooks, and commands

  • agentsys by agent-sh · ⭐ 991

    AI writes code. This automates everything else · 24 plugins · 49 agents · 44 skills · for Claude Code, OpenCod

  • awesome-agent-skills by skillmatic-ai · ⭐ 681

    The definitive resource for Agent Skills - modular capabilities revolutionizing AI agent architecture

  • skillport by gotalab · ⭐ 406

    Bring Agent Skills to Any AI Agent and Coding Agent — via CLI or MCP. Manage once, serve anywhere.

  • ai-workflow by nicepkg · ⭐ 283

    🚀 170+ pre-built skills for Claude Code, Cursor, Codex & 14+ AI tools. Stop re-teaching your AI the same thin

  • awesome-ai-agent-skills by seb1n · ⭐ 149

    103 ready-to-use AI agent skills for Claude Code, OpenAI Codex, Gemini CLI, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Windsurf,

More Codex Skill Tools

Explore other popular codex skill tools:

View all Codex Skill tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is FableCodex?

FableCodex is 🗿 FableCodex is a Codex-style coding agent workflow that plans like Fable.. It is categorized as a Codex Skill with 436 GitHub stars.

What programming language is FableCodex written in?

FableCodex is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as codex, context-engineering, fable-5.

How do I install or use FableCodex?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the FableCodex GitHub repository at github.com/baskduf/FableCodex. The project has 436 stars and 53 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does FableCodex use?

FableCodex is released under the AGPL-3.0 license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to FableCodex?

The top alternatives to FableCodex on Agent Skills Hub include claude-workflow-v2, agentsys, awesome-agent-skills. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Codex Skill tools