bgts-context-engine — security grade SAFE, quality 67/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 67/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by bgts-ai-org · MCP Server · ★ 70

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is bgts-context-engine safe to install? View the security audit →

About bgts-context-engine

Deterministic code-graph context for AI coding agents. Ask "why does the login timeout fire on the meeting webhook?" and get the eight symbols that actually answer it — ranked, budgeted, and reproducible. Quick start · Use it from your agent · How it works · Supported models · Documentation · Türkçe Why this exists An agent working on an unfamiliar repository has to decide what to read bef

ai-agentsapache-ageastcode-graphcode-searchcodebase-indexingcontext-engineeringdeterministicdeterministic-aideveloper-tools

Quick Facts

Stars70
Forks3
LanguagePython
CategoryMCP Server
LicenseMIT
Quality Score67.2838553499279/100
Open Issues8
Last Updated2026-10-09
Created2026-09-08
Platformsmcp, python
Est. Tokens~18k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with bgts-context-engine for enhanced workflows:

  • codespaces — semantic(0.23)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (58%)
  • habit-hooks — semantic(0.19)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (57%)

bgts-context-engine alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a bgts-context-engine alternative? If you're comparing bgts-context-engine with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • trace-mcp by nikolai-vysotskyi · ⭐ 191

    Framework-aware code intelligence MCP server — 88 framework integrations, 81 languages, 72.7% fewer input toke

  • logicstamp-context by LogicStamp · ⭐ 84

    A Context Compiler for TypeScript. Deterministic, diffable architectural contracts and dependency graphs for A

  • tree-sitter-analyzer by aimasteracc · ⭐ 52

    Cross-language-safe code-intelligence MCP for AI agents: 13 languages, family-gated call graph, blast radius,

  • fossil-mcp by yfedoseev · ⭐ 68

    The code quality toolkit for the agentic AI era. Find dead code, clones, and scaffolding across 15 languages.

  • leantoken by morluto · ⭐ 65

    Code intelligence for agents: find the code that matters and keep your context window and tokens lean.

  • aiwg by jmagly · ⭐ 224

    Reusable project context and specialist workflows for the AI tools you already use. Agents, skills, rules and

More MCP Server Tools

Explore other popular mcp server tools:

View all MCP Server tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is bgts-context-engine?

bgts-context-engine is Deterministic code-graph context engine for AI coding agents - PostgreSQL + Apache AGE + pgvector, MCP & REST, no LLM in the loop.. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 70 GitHub stars.

What programming language is bgts-context-engine written in?

bgts-context-engine is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as ai-agents, apache-age, ast.

How do I install or use bgts-context-engine?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the bgts-context-engine GitHub repository at github.com/bgts-ai-org/bgts-context-engine. The project has 70 stars and 3 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does bgts-context-engine use?

bgts-context-engine is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to bgts-context-engine?

The top alternatives to bgts-context-engine on Agent Skills Hub include trace-mcp, logicstamp-context, tree-sitter-analyzer. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse MCP Server tools