by black-forest-labs · MCP Server · ★ 13
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 13 |
| Forks | 2 |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 71/100 |
| Open Issues | 3 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-29 |
| Created | 2026-05-11 |
| Platforms | cli, mcp |
| Est. Tokens | ~19k |
Official FLUX MCP server. Generate, edit, vary, and browse FLUX images from any MCP client.
Looking for a flux-mcp alternative? If you're comparing flux-mcp with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Governance gateway for AI agents — bounded, auditable, session-aware control with MCP proxy, shell proxy & HTT
147 AI tools for Unity game development via MCP (Model Context Protocol). Connect Claude, Cursor, and AI assis
MCP server for YouTube — search videos, get transcripts, channels, and playlists. Works with Claude, Cursor &
Automatic context preservation for Claude Code. Never lose work to compaction again. 7 hooks, 187 semantic pat
Your Digital Companion. Self-hosted Telegram bot orchestrating multiple AI providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Googl
Open-source ai image generator skill and ai video generator skill for Codex, Claude Code, OpenClaw, Cursor, an
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: