browserable — security grade SAFE, quality 70/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 70/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by browserable · Agent Tool · ★ 1.2k

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is browserable safe to install? View the security audit →

About browserable

Website Twitter Open source browser automation library for AI agents Browserable allows you to build browser agents that can navigate sites, fill out forms, clicking buttons and extract information. It is currently at 90.4% on the Web Voyager benchmarks. Quick start The fastest way to get started is to run the npx command. This will guide you through the setup process and ensure you have all required dependencies. Visit to set your LLM and Remote Browser API Keys to start using. Manual setup Clone the repository: Pre-requisites: Install Docker Install Docker Compose Start the development environment: Set your API keys: Open Browserable admin dashboard: [http://localhost:2001/dash/@admin/settings](http://localhost:2001/dash/@admin

ai-agentsai-toolsbrowser-automationbrowser-usebrowser-use-jsdeep-researchjavascriptllmplaywright

Quick Facts

Stars1,208
Forks104
LanguageJavaScript
CategoryAgent Tool
LicenseMIT
Quality Score70.0612153286231/100
Open Issues9
Last Updated2025-08-27
Created2025-04-07
Platformsbrowser, node
Est. Tokens~560k

browserable alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a browserable alternative? If you're comparing browserable with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • browsernode by leoning60 · ⭐ 1.0k

    🌐 Make websites accessible for AI agents. Automate tasks online with ease.

  • web-agent-protocol by OTA-Tech-AI · ⭐ 509

    🌐Web Agent Protocol (WAP) - Record and replay user interactions in the browser with MCP support

  • Interceptor by Hacker-Valley-Media · ⭐ 481

    Browser automation and computer use for AI agents. One CLI and MCP server for your signed-in browser, native m

  • brightdata-mcp by brightdata · ⭐ 2.7k

    A powerful Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides an all-in-one solution for public web access.

  • pydantic-deepagents by vstorm-co · ⭐ 1.1k

    Open-source, self-hosted Claude Code - a terminal AI assistant and the Python framework behind it. Tool-callin

  • octocode-mcp by bgauryy · ⭐ 838

    MCP server for semantic code research and context generation on real-time using LLM patterns | Search naturall

More Agent Tool Tools

Explore other popular agent tool tools:

View all Agent Tool tools →

Popular JavaScript Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is browserable?

browserable is Open source and self-hostable browser automation library for AI agents. It is categorized as a Agent Tool with 1.2k GitHub stars.

What programming language is browserable written in?

browserable is primarily written in JavaScript. It covers topics such as ai-agents, ai-tools, browser-automation.

How do I install or use browserable?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the browserable GitHub repository at github.com/browserable/browserable. The project has 1.2k stars and 104 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does browserable use?

browserable is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to browserable?

The top alternatives to browserable on Agent Skills Hub include browsernode, web-agent-protocol, Interceptor. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Agent Tool tools