by buildingjoshbetter · MCP Server · ★ 378
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
Featured in: Agent Memory
pip install truememory
Taken from the project's README on GitHub. Check the security audit before running it.
Flagged: sudo usage. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 378 |
| Forks | 47 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | AGPL-3.0 |
| Quality Score | 66/100 |
| Open Issues | 14 |
| Last Updated | 2026-08-29 |
| Created | 2026-03-18 |
| Platforms | claude-code, cli, codex, gemini, mcp, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~17k |
– – Why · Quick Start · Compare · <a hr
These tools work well together with TrueMemory for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a TrueMemory alternative? If you're comparing TrueMemory with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Local-first persistent agentic memory powered by Recursive Memory Harness (RMH). Open source must win.
Structural code intelligence for AI agents — semantic search, knowledge graphs, and a built-in MCP server in o
MCP server that lets Claude Code and other AI agents read and search large PDFs, one file or a whole folder: a
🏛 [UNDER CONSTRUCTION] A (roman) claude plugin marketplace
A lightweight, rollbackable, and visual Long-Term Memory Server for MCP Agents. Say goodbye to Vector RAG and
Persistent memory for AI coding agents
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: