by caibucaiAI · Codex Skill · ★ 52
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
git clone https://github.com/caibucaiAI/caicai-english-buddy.git ~/.codex/skills/caicai-english-buddyTaken from the project's README on GitHub. Check the security audit before running it.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 52 |
| Forks | 3 |
| Category | Codex Skill |
| Quality Score | 51/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-09 |
| Created | 2026-08-30 |
| Platforms | codex |
| Est. Tokens | ~2k |
菜菜英语搭子 Caicai’s English Buddy 一个 Codex Skill，两种学习模式：英语口语练习，以及结合录音转录的英文视频学习。记录保存到你自己的 Obsidian。 使用 启动时先问：“你这次想要进入什么模式？英语口语练习，还是英语视频学习？”已明确选择模式时直接开始。 英语口语练习：自然对话、轻量纠错、完整逐字稿、中文记录、单词本与周复盘。 英语视频学习：边看边发术语问题，结合录音上下文用中文解释；结束时可做简短回考，也可以直接归档。保存视频笔记、问答记录、原始录音逐字稿、独立单词本和周复盘材料。 两种模式在语言学习目录下并列，各有自己的索引、单词本、对话记录、待办清单和周复盘。周复盘材料积累不等于已完成回考；学习反馈依据实际回答，不提前判定掌握。 安装 首次使用时提供你的 Obsidian Vault...
These tools work well together with caicai-english-buddy for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a caicai-english-buddy alternative? If you're comparing caicai-english-buddy with other codex skill tools, these 1 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
A Codex/Claude skill that maintains per-repo operating theory documents.
Explore other popular codex skill tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: