No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
by cameronrye · MCP Server · ★ 132
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
🔒 Is openzim-mcp safe to install? View the security audit →
OpenZIM MCP Server Transform static ZIM archives into dynamic knowledge engines for AI models <img src="https://img.shields.io/pypi/dm/open
| Stars | 132 |
| Forks | 14 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 69.9288884912517/100 |
| Open Issues | 2 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-18 |
| Created | 2025-09-14 |
| Platforms | mcp, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~25k |
Looking for a openzim-mcp alternative? If you're comparing openzim-mcp with other mcp server tools, these 1 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
AI, fully local on your computer.
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
openzim-mcp is OpenZIM MCP is a modern, secure, and high-performance MCP (Model Context Protocol) server that enables AI models to access and search ZIM format knowledge bases offline.. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 132 GitHub stars.
openzim-mcp is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as kiwix, mcp, mcp-server.
You can find installation instructions and usage details in the openzim-mcp GitHub repository at github.com/cameronrye/openzim-mcp. The project has 132 stars and 14 forks, indicating an active community.
openzim-mcp is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.
The top alternatives to openzim-mcp on Agent Skills Hub include HilbertRaum. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: