by chrisribe · MCP Server · ★ 8
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 8 |
| Forks | 1 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 72/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-04-17 |
| Created | 2025-08-22 |
| Platforms | cli, mcp, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~39k |
🧠 Persistent local memory for AI assistants across conversations. SQLite, no cloud, no config, works with any MCP client.
These tools work well together with simple-memory-mcp for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a simple-memory-mcp alternative? If you're comparing simple-memory-mcp with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
🏛 [UNDER CONSTRUCTION] A (roman) claude plugin marketplace
Governance gateway for AI agents — bounded, auditable, session-aware control with MCP proxy, shell proxy & HTT
Local-first AI memory archive. Import ChatGPT, Claude, and Grok exports, generate semantic embeddings, and sea
Local-first AI knowledge layer. Extract architecture, query from any AI tool via MCP. Private by architecture.
Local citation-backed recall for Pi, OMP, Claude Code, Codex, and ChatGPT history.
LLM-managed personal knowledge base. Auto-extracts from git repos, Claude Code sessions (via ccrider FTS5), an
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: