by coipond · Codex Skill · ★ 777
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 777 |
| Forks | 67 |
| Language | Go |
| Category | Codex Skill |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 63/100 |
| Open Issues | 35 |
| Last Updated | 2026-11-06 |
| Created | 2026-01-07 |
| Platforms | claude-code, codex, docker, go |
| Est. Tokens | ~18k |
Coi (Code on Incus) Give the agent a machine. Just not yours. runs your AI coding tool (Claude Code, Codex, opencode, pi, omp) inside its own isolated Linux system: a full-OS container with root access, systemd, Docker, and the freedom to install anything.
Looking for a coi alternative? If you're comparing coi with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Unified CLI for running AI coding agents in isolated containers. Includes built-in local metrics collection, H
Persistent Linux workspaces for agentic development.
Safely run OpenCode, Codex, Claude Code with full permissions.
MCP server for OpenCode AI — 70 tools, 10 resources, 5 prompts. Use npx opencode-mcp with Claude Desktop, Clau
One Hub All LLMs For You | 为个人打造的 LLM API 聚合网关
A durable process per agent, with memory that survives restarts
Explore other popular codex skill tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: