LLMFuzzAgent: [Corca / ML] Automatically solved Gandalf AI with LLM

by corca-ai · Agent Tool · ★ 51

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 54/100

None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.

The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.

Quick Facts

Stars51
Forks6
LanguagePython
CategoryAgent Tool
Quality Score54/100
Last Updated2023-07-11
Created2023-07-04
Platformspython
Est. Tokens~1k

About LLMFuzzAgent

LLMFuzzAgent Can we create a fuzzer to discover vulnerabilities in the LLMs? This is the initial step towards finding the answer. Based on the following results, LLMs have the potential to be white-hat hackers. Gandalf Challenge - Write-up https://github.com/corca-ai/LLMFuzzAgent/assets/64528476/d0b1293f-f307-48a4-a75c-32bb864b085f Gandalf is a prompt injection game.

More Agent Tool Tools

Explore other popular agent tool tools:

View all Agent Tool tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Agent Tool tools