by corca-ai · Agent Tool · ★ 1.7k
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 1,701 |
| Forks | 374 |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| Quality Score | 54/100 |
| Open Issues | 226 |
| Last Updated | 2025-08-20 |
| Created | 2023-07-05 |
| Est. Tokens | ~7k |
Awesome LLM Security A curation of awesome tools, documents and projects about LLM Security. Contributions are always welcome. Please read the Contribution Guidelines before contributing. [!NOTE] ⚡ For efficient research navigation, we’re sharing PDFs via Moonlight, which provides summaries alongside the original paper.
Looking for a awesome-llm-security alternative? If you're comparing awesome-llm-security with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Tutorials, Guides and Agent Skills Directories
A curated list of Generative AI tools, works, models, and references
A curated list of awesome platforms, tools, practices and resources that helps run LLMs locally
A curated list of awesome resources, tools, and other shiny things for LLM prompt engineering.
A database of SDKs, frameworks, libraries, and tools for creating, monitoring, debugging and deploying autonom
A curated list of Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: