by cporter202 · MCP Server · ★ 179
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 179 |
| Forks | 43 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | MCP Server |
| Quality Score | 61/100 |
| Open Issues | 2 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-26 |
| Created | 2026-07-22 |
| Platforms | browser, mcp, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~25k |
Browse categories · All 118 APIs · Featured Workers · Use the API · Download CSV · Contribute CoreClaw API Directory A polished, community
Looking for a coreclaw-api-directory alternative? If you're comparing coreclaw-api-directory with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Anti-detection browser server for AI agents — REST API wrapping Camoufox engine with OpenClaw plugin support
The World's Most Comprehensive, Authoritative, and Structured Open Source Data Source Knowledge Base
Overture is an open-source, locally running web interface delivered as an MCP (Model Context Protocol) server
AI agent skills for UnifAPI MCP and public-data workflows
Daymon puts your favorite AI to work 24/7. It schedules, remembers, and orchestrates your own virtual team. Fr
Native Safari browser automation for AI agents. 98 tools via AppleScript — zero overhead, keeps logins, runs s
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: