by cychien · Codex Skill · ★ 7
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
Featured in: AI Design Tools
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 7 |
| Forks | 0 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | Codex Skill |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 69/100 |
| Open Issues | 1 |
| Last Updated | 2026-11-07 |
| Created | 2026-08-09 |
| Platforms | browser, claude-code, cli, codex, gemini, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~16k |
The best way to design with AI agents.
Looking for a ezdesign alternative? If you're comparing ezdesign with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
One window for all your AI coding agents. Run Claude, Codex, OpenCode, Gemini, Antigravity, Cursor, and Copilo
Claude Code on your laptop and remote dev boxes, in one web page. Sessions keep running when SSH drops (no tmu
any llm browsing for you in chrome
An agent skill that directs websites and apps the way films are made: cast a director, write a shot list, shoo
Enable Claude in Chrome extension to work with alternative Chromium-based browsers (Brave, Arc, Vivaldi, Edge,
🏛 [UNDER CONSTRUCTION] A (roman) claude plugin marketplace
Explore other popular codex skill tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: