Fray — repository deleted, archived audit

Repository no longer available — dalisecurity/Fray returns 404 on GitHub. It was deleted, or its owner's account was removed. The data below is our last successful snapshot.

by dalisecurity · MCP Server · ★ 53

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

attack-surfacebugbountycloudflaremcpmcp-serverowasppayload-databasepenetration-testingpentestingpython

Quick Facts

Stars53
Forks4
LanguagePython
CategoryMCP Server
Quality Score50/100
Open Issues2
Last Updated2026-03-18
Created2026-03-01
Platformsmcp, python
Est. Tokens~505k

About Fray

AI-native security toolkit — fray go target.com scans everything. 7,800+ payloads, 98 WAF vendors, 42+ recon checks. Zero config

Fray alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a Fray alternative? If you're comparing Fray with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • tengu by rfunix · ⭐ 64

    AI-powered penetration testing MCP server

  • agent-audit by HeadyZhang · ⭐ 229

    Static security scanner for LLM agents — prompt injection, MCP config auditing, taint analysis. 51 rules mappe

  • gori by hahwul · ⭐ 133

    A fast, keyboard-driven HTTP intercepting proxy and pentesting toolkit for the terminal built for humans and A

  • agent-security-scanner-mcp by sinewaveai · ⭐ 121

    Security scanner MCP server for AI coding agents. Prompt injection firewall, package hallucination detection (

  • mcp-zap-server by dtkmn · ⭐ 68

    Give AI agents a safe, self-hosted ZAP operator for guided web security scans, findings, reports, and producti

  • AutoRedTeam-Orchestrator by Coff0xc · ⭐ 263

    MCP-native security automation workbench (SDK + CLI + MCP) — authorized testing + static AI/MCP attack-surface

More MCP Server Tools

Explore other popular mcp server tools:

View all MCP Server tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse MCP Server tools