by danium · Codex Skill · ★ 307
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
Lateral thinking skills for AI agents - 8 techniques + a router. de Bono for your coding agent.
| Stars | 307 |
| Forks | 23 |
| Category | Codex Skill |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 57.8642362979725/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-13 |
| Created | 2026-07-09 |
| Platforms | claude-code, codex |
| Est. Tokens | ~15k |
These tools work well together with lateral-thinking for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a lateral-thinking alternative? If you're comparing lateral-thinking with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Universal Claude Code workflow plugin with agents, skills, hooks, and commands
A skill creator that proves its skills work. Evidence-driven skill creation for Claude Code and Codex: baselin
AI agents that act as your personal venture analyst - from startup idea brainstorming to full validation and g
24 cross-platform agent skills for Claude Code, Cursor, Codex & Gemini CLI — databases, messaging, research, T
Intensity slider from tipsy (0.1) to blackout (1.0). 5 moods, 8 creative techniques. Lowers inhibition, not in
Better 'AskUserQuestion' - A lightweight MCP server/OpenCode plugin/Agent Skills + CLI tool that allows your L
Explore other popular codex skill tools:
lateral-thinking is Lateral thinking skills for AI agents - 8 techniques + a router. de Bono for your coding agent.. It is categorized as a Codex Skill with 307 GitHub stars.
You can find installation instructions and usage details in the lateral-thinking GitHub repository at github.com/danium/lateral-thinking. The project has 307 stars and 23 forks, indicating an active community.
lateral-thinking is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.
The top alternatives to lateral-thinking on Agent Skills Hub include claude-workflow-v2, SkillForge, idea-validation-agents. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: