by davialabs · Agent Tool · ★ 1.7k
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
npm i -g daviaTaken from the project's README on GitHub. Check the security audit before running it.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 1,654 |
| Forks | 121 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 67/100 |
| Open Issues | 6 |
| Last Updated | 2026-01-19 |
| Created | 2025-11-05 |
| Platforms | node |
| Est. Tokens | ~88k |
What is Davia? Davia is an open-source tool designed for AI coding agents to generate interactive internal documentation for your codebase.
Looking for a davia alternative? If you're comparing davia with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
A personal knowledge base that builds and maintains itself. Drop in sources — Claude (or Codex/Gemini) reads t
Framework for AI agents to build and maintain a digital brain through Obsidian wiki | Memory System for Agents
README file generator, powered by AI.
Precision documentation from OpenAPI, MCP, Doxygen, and Markdown guides. Static HTML you own.
Read, write, search, and surgically edit Obsidian vault notes, tags, and frontmatter via MCP. STDIO or Streama
A comprehensive collection of AI development patterns for building software with AI assistance, organized by i
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: