by davidmosiah · MCP Server · ★ 80
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
npx -y google-health-mcp-unofficial coverage --live --json
npx -y google-health-mcp-unofficial --httpTaken from the project's README on GitHub.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 80 |
| Forks | 14 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 71/100 |
| Open Issues | 3 |
| Last Updated | 2026-11-05 |
| Created | 2026-05-07 |
| Platforms | claude-code, mcp, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~19k |
Google Health MCP Read user-authorized Google Health API v4 data — Fitbit, Pixel Watch and partners — locally via OAuth. Beta. Local-first MCP server — tokens never leave your machine. <
Looking for a google-health-mcp alternative? If you're comparing google-health-mcp with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Notion MCP server with token auth: connect Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, VS Code and Codex to Notion pa
🏛 [UNDER CONSTRUCTION] A (roman) claude plugin marketplace
Google Analytics 4 data to AI agents, agentic workflows, and MCP clients. Give agents analysis-ready access to
Persistent memory for AI coding agents
📜 An MCP server for conversation history search and retrieval in Claude Code
🤖 Taskade MCP · Official MCP server and OpenAPI to MCP codegen. Build AI agent tools from any OpenAPI API and
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: