by denis-prilepskiy · MCP Server · ★ 75
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
Flagged: sudo usage. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 75 |
| Forks | 5 |
| Language | Open Policy Agent |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 74/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-08-09 |
| Created | 2026-04-14 |
| Platforms | mcp |
| Est. Tokens | ~17k |
Governed Agentic AI for ITSM — A Practical Blueprint Citation If you use this blueprint in your work or research, please cite: Prilepskiy, D. (2026). Governed Agentic AI for ITSM — A Practical Blueprint (v0.2.0). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20256777 BibTeX: Start with the control plane, not the agent. The agent is the easy part. Status: v0.2 — reference blueprint / starter kit.
Looking for a governed-agentic-itsm-blueprint alternative? If you're comparing governed-agentic-itsm-blueprint with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
🟪 Open-source runtime that ships any LangGraph or Google ADK agent as a production-ready FastAPI service. Bun
Elixir Model Context Protocol (MCP) SDK
An MCP server that executes Python code in isolated rootless containers with optional MCP server proxying. Imp
An introduction to the world of AI Agents
ServiceNow MCP server: 500+ tools and 26 AI capabilities for any AI (Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Cursor, Copilot)
Manage / Proxy / Secure your MCP Servers
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: