by diet103 · AI Tool · ★ 10.0k
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
Featured in: Claude Code Hooks, Subagents & Statusline
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 10,023 |
| Forks | 1,224 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | AI Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 65/100 |
| Open Issues | 18 |
| Last Updated | 2026-07-13 |
| Created | 2025-10-30 |
| Platforms | claude-code, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~16k |
Claude Code Infrastructure Showcase A curated reference library of production-tested Claude Code infrastructure. Born from 6 months of real-world use managing a complex TypeScript microservices project, this showcase provides the patterns and systems that solved the "skills don't activate automatically" problem and scaled Claude Code for enterprise development.
Looking for a claude-code-infrastructure-showcase alternative? If you're comparing claude-code-infrastructure-showcase with other ai tool tools, these 3 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
This tool has been deprecated. Use Agentic Document Extraction instead.
Visual Skills Pack for Obsidian: generate Canvas, Excalidraw, and Mermaid diagrams from text with Claude Code
All powerful skills of ClaudeKit.cc!
Explore other popular ai tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: