by duckduckdeploy · MCP Server · ★ 9
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 9 |
| Forks | 1 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 54/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-21 |
| Created | 2026-10-15 |
| Platforms | mcp, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~18k |
Open Source Ahrefs & SEMrush
Looking for a openseo alternative? If you're comparing openseo with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Free SEO tool — open-source, self-hosted alternative to Ahrefs, Semrush & Moz. 99 tools: site audits, rank tra
Free Rust SEO and GEO toolkit powered by TypeSafe Jev: 58-rule audits, site crawls, AI citation checks, rank d
Open source ASO tool and keyword rank tracker for the Apple App Store and Google Play. Self-host with Docker,
Free SEO Audit MCP server for Claude - captures and stores all the raw data you need for a complete technical
Headless MCP server for Screaming Frog SEO Spider – run crawls, export and analyze crawl data via the CLI. Sma
Governance gateway for AI agents — bounded, auditable, session-aware control with MCP proxy, shell proxy & HTT
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: