by eat-pray-ai · MCP Server · ★ 448
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
The AI-powered toolkit that grows your YouTube channel on autopilot.
| Stars | 448 |
| Forks | 46 |
| Language | Go |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 37.75/100 |
| Open Issues | 4 |
| Last Updated | 2026-05-05 |
| Created | 2023-05-20 |
| Platforms | claude-code, cli, docker, gemini, go, mcp |
| Est. Tokens | ~624k |
These tools work well together with yutu for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a yutu alternative? If you're comparing yutu with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
CLI tool to produce MD context files from many sources, to help interact with LLMs (ChatGPT, Llama3, Claude, e
你的端侧 AI 助手,她可以操作终端,也可以完成 Android 世界的广泛任务 || Your on-device AI assistant, capable of operating terminals and pe
Open-source earning-focused swarm intelligence engine. Self-governing AI collectives (queen, workers, quorum v
Daymon puts your favorite AI to work 24/7. It schedules, remembers, and orchestrates your own virtual team. Fr
OS-agnostic, model-agnostic desktop automation server. Gives any AI agent eyes, hands, and ground-truth verifi
AI controls your OS. OS AI Computer Use, OS and API agnostic. For now on OpenAI and Anthropic API. Desktop app
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
yutu is The AI-powered toolkit that grows your YouTube channel on autopilot.. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 448 GitHub stars.
yutu is primarily written in Go. It covers topics such as agent, ai, automation.
You can find installation instructions and usage details in the yutu GitHub repository at github.com/eat-pray-ai/yutu. The project has 448 stars and 46 forks, indicating an active community.
yutu is released under the Apache-2.0 license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.
The top alternatives to yutu on Agent Skills Hub include ai-context, OpenOmniBot, room. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.