CyberGuard — security grade CAUTION, quality 62/100

Security audit verdict: CAUTION · quality 62/100

Flagged: sudo usage. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by elsechord · MCP Server · ★ 54

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is CyberGuard safe to install? View the security audit →

About CyberGuard

CyberGuard 60-second demo (console walk-through): cyberguard-demo-60s.mp4 — release asset of v0.14.0. CyberGuard is an evidence-driven autonomous security operations team built on AgentTeams. It coordinates specialized Agents for alert fusion, threat intelligence, network hunting, endpoint forensics, response planning, controlled execution and independent recovery verification. The project is designed for the GOAI “Agent Infra 新智基座” track. It intentionally reuses AgentTeams for orchestration, Matrix collaboration, Skill distribution, shared storage and credential brokering, while CyberGuard provides the security-domai

agent-infraagentscopeagentteamsai-socaudithuman-in-the-loopincident-responsellm-agentsmcpmulti-agent

Quick Facts

Stars54
Forks1
LanguagePython
CategoryMCP Server
LicenseApache-2.0
Quality Score62.1550544873698/100
Last Updated2026-09-24
Created2026-09-17
Platformsmcp, python
Est. Tokens~18k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with CyberGuard for enhanced workflows:

  • vigil — semantic(0.46)+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (60%)

CyberGuard alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a CyberGuard alternative? If you're comparing CyberGuard with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • AI-SOC-Agent by M507 · ⭐ 51

    Blackhat 2025 presentation and codebase: AI SOC agent & MCP server for automated security investigation, alert

  • Wazuh-MCP-Server by gensecaihq · ⭐ 246

    Production-grade MCP server for Wazuh SIEM — 55 security tools for alert triage, threat hunting, vulnerability

  • Valhuntir by AppliedIR · ⭐ 106

    Valhuntir CLI — AI-augmented incident response platform

  • langchainjs-mcp-adapters by langchain-ai · ⭐ 248

    ** THIS REPO HAS MOVED TO https://github.com/langchain-ai/langchainjs/tree/main/libs/langchain-mcp-adapters **

  • agent-skills by jdrhyne · ⭐ 241

    A collection of AI agent skills for Clawdbot, Claude Code, Codex

  • bitbucket-mcp by MatanYemini · ⭐ 165

    Bitbucket MCP - A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for integrating with Bitbucket Cloud and Server APIs

More MCP Server Tools

Explore other popular mcp server tools:

View all MCP Server tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CyberGuard?

CyberGuard is Evidence-driven autonomous SOC team on AgentTeams: hash-bound approvals, HMAC audit chain, rollback and reproducible attack scenarios — auditable governance primitives for agent infrastructure.. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 54 GitHub stars.

What programming language is CyberGuard written in?

CyberGuard is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as agent-infra, agentscope, agentteams.

How do I install or use CyberGuard?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the CyberGuard GitHub repository at github.com/elsechord/CyberGuard. The project has 54 stars and 1 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does CyberGuard use?

CyberGuard is released under the Apache-2.0 license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to CyberGuard?

The top alternatives to CyberGuard on Agent Skills Hub include AI-SOC-Agent, Wazuh-MCP-Server, Valhuntir. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse MCP Server tools