by emirbartu · Codex Skill · ★ 16
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 16 |
| Forks | 1 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | Codex Skill |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 72/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-08 |
| Created | 2026-09-19 |
| Platforms | claude-code, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~15k |
Jev for every agentic development workflow — the System One decision model wired into whatever harness an agent codes in: OpenCode today, Claude Code and Hermes adapters next.
Looking for a jev-for-all alternative? If you're comparing jev-for-all with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Shep AI CLI & UI - Multi-Session SDLC Control Center for AI Coding Agents
High-value AI skills repository for Codex, Claude Code, OpenClaw, agents, prompts, and automation workflows.
OpenCode plugin for Claude Code memory: persistent local Markdown memory shared with Claude Code, zero config,
aivectormemory 是一款基于 Model Context Protocol (MCP) 开发的OpenClaw、OpenCode、ClaudeCodeAI记忆管理工具。它专门为 Claude、OpenCode
Traffic light for AI Agents and TypeScript/Node multi-agent orchestrator with shared state, guardrails, and ad
Stops AI coding agents from claiming work is done without evidence. Deterministic hooks decide, TypeSafe's Jev
Explore other popular codex skill tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: