by erweixin · MCP Server · ★ 51
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 51 |
| Forks | 6 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | MCP Server |
| Quality Score | 64/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-04-10 |
| Created | 2025-04-02 |
| Platforms | mcp, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~41k |
Prompt Challenges A learning path for everyday users: from one-shot chatbot queries to Cursor-style IDE collaboration and OpenClaw-style local agent governance with MCP, Skills, and harness thinking. Built with Astro 5, deployed for Cloudflare Pages (static pages + Worker for ).
Looking for a prompt-challenges alternative? If you're comparing prompt-challenges with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Promptdesk is a tool designed for effectively creating, organizing, and evaluating prompts and large language
🪼 Lagune AI is your security copilot as you build, your Blue Team when you audit, whether you're a developer
LLM prompt language based on Jinja. Banks provides tools and functions to build prompts text and chat messages
🌊 Your security copilot as you build, your Blue Team when you audit, whether you're a developer or not.
Advanced AI tagging and prompt generation studio.
A collection of AI agent skills for Clawdbot, Claude Code, Codex
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: