by feiskyer · MCP Server · ★ 161
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 161 |
| Forks | 44 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | ISC |
| Quality Score | 64/100 |
| Open Issues | 30 |
| Last Updated | 2026-06-20 |
| Created | 2023-04-20 |
| Platforms | claude-code, gemini, mcp, node, vscode |
| Est. Tokens | ~314k |
An VS Code ChatGPT Copilot Extension The Most Loved Open-Source ChatGPT Extension for VS Code ChatGPT Copilot is a powerful and telemetry-free extension for Visual Studio Code, bringing the capabilities of ChatGPT directly into your coding environment.
Looking for a chatgpt-copilot alternative? If you're comparing chatgpt-copilot with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
[archived] c4 GenAI Suite
Personal and autonomous AI coding agent. Writes and edits code automatically. No third-party servers, token li
An md file as a chat interface and editable history in one.
Ruby Implementation of Nano Bots: small, AI-powered bots that can be easily shared as a single file, designed
Shell and coding agent on mcp clients
Unreal Engine plugin for LLM/GenAI models & MCP UE5 server. OpenAI GPT-5, Deepseek R1, Claude Opus/Sonnet, Gem
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: