mcp-think-tank — security grade SAFE, quality 68/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 68/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by flight505 · MCP Server · ★ 61

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is mcp-think-tank safe to install? View the security audit →

About mcp-think-tank

MCP Think Tank <a href="https://mseep

Quick Facts

Stars61
Forks13
LanguageTypeScript
CategoryMCP Server
LicenseMIT
Quality Score67.5233948594208/100
Open Issues1
Last Updated2025-07-14
Created2025-04-10
Platformsclaude-code, mcp, node
Est. Tokens~331k

More MCP Server Tools

Explore other popular mcp server tools:

View all MCP Server tools →

Popular TypeScript Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is mcp-think-tank?

mcp-think-tank is MCP Think Tank is a powerful Model Context Protocol (MCP) server designed to enhance the capabilities of AI assistants like Cursor and Claude. It provides a structured environment for enhanced reasoni. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 61 GitHub stars.

What programming language is mcp-think-tank written in?

mcp-think-tank is primarily written in TypeScript.

How do I install or use mcp-think-tank?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the mcp-think-tank GitHub repository at github.com/flight505/mcp-think-tank. The project has 61 stars and 13 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does mcp-think-tank use?

mcp-think-tank is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse MCP Server tools