prompt-caching — security grade SAFE, quality 73/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 73/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by flightlesstux · MCP Server · ★ 131

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is prompt-caching safe to install? View the security audit →

About prompt-caching

prompt-caching An MCP plugin that helps developers understand, optimize, and debug Anthropic's prompt caching in their own applications — with tools for injecting breakpoints, analyzing cacheability, and tracking real-time cache savings. Who is this for? This plugin is built for developers building their own applications with the Anthropic API. Important note for Claude Code users: Claude Code already handles prompt caching automatically for its own API calls — system prompts, tool definitions, and conversation history are cached out of the box. You cannot add more caching on top of Claude Code's own sessions, and you don't need to. See Anthropic's prompt caching docs for details on how automatic caching works. This plugin is useful when: You are building an app or agent wi

anthropicclaudeclaude-codecost-reductiondeveloper-toolsllmmcpprompt-cachingtoken-optimizationtypescript

Quick Facts

Stars131
Forks7
LanguageTypeScript
CategoryMCP Server
LicenseMIT
Quality Score73.0794282112976/100
Open Issues13
Last Updated2026-06-12
Created2026-03-12
Platformsclaude-code, mcp, node
Est. Tokens~119k

prompt-caching alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a prompt-caching alternative? If you're comparing prompt-caching with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • omni by fajarhide · ⭐ 373

    Your agent pays twice for output it has already seen. OMNI returns a handle instead: 97.2% off a file read twi

  • llmtrim by fkiene · ⭐ 239

    Local proxy that compresses your LLM API requests so you pay less, with no change to the answers. Trims wasted

  • claude-historian-mcp by Vvkmnn · ⭐ 178

    📜 An MCP server for conversation history search and retrieval in Claude Code

  • thedistillery by The-Distillery-dev · ⭐ 114

    The Distillery. A Token Optimization Proxy

  • claude-emporium by Vvkmnn · ⭐ 82

    🏛 [UNDER CONSTRUCTION] A (roman) claude plugin marketplace

  • Overture by SixHq · ⭐ 641

    Overture is an open-source, locally running web interface delivered as an MCP (Model Context Protocol) server

More MCP Server Tools

Explore other popular mcp server tools:

View all MCP Server tools →

Popular TypeScript Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is prompt-caching?

prompt-caching is Automatic prompt caching for Claude Code. Cuts token costs by up to 90% on repeated file reads, bug fix sessions, and long coding conversations - zero config.. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 131 GitHub stars.

What programming language is prompt-caching written in?

prompt-caching is primarily written in TypeScript. It covers topics such as anthropic, claude, claude-code.

How do I install or use prompt-caching?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the prompt-caching GitHub repository at github.com/flightlesstux/prompt-caching. The project has 131 stars and 7 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does prompt-caching use?

prompt-caching is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to prompt-caching?

The top alternatives to prompt-caching on Agent Skills Hub include omni, llmtrim, claude-historian-mcp. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse MCP Server tools