by flynnoct · Agent Tool · ★ 170
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
git clone https://github.com/flynnoct/chatgpt-telegram-bot.git
Taken from the project's README on GitHub. Check the security audit before running it.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 170 |
| Forks | 38 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 73/100 |
| Open Issues | 12 |
| Last Updated | 2023-11-18 |
| Created | 2023-03-02 |
| Platforms | python |
| Est. Tokens | ~15k |
ChatGPT Bot for Telegram 💥 Read This Before Updating to v1.4 We adjusted configuration format since v1.4.0, which is NOT compatible with previous versions. Please check the config doc for more details. You should backup your old config file and create a new one after updating to v1.4.0.
Looking for a chatgpt-telegram-bot alternative? If you're comparing chatgpt-telegram-bot with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Shell and coding agent on mcp clients
Rent the model. Own everything else. Free, open-source AI app for real work.
✨Lightweight LLM Client with MCP 🔌 & Characters 👤
MCP Server for Telegram
Anthropic Claude & Google Bard Bot for Telegram.
c4 GenAI Suite
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: