by frankShan001 · MCP Server · ★ 35
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
Featured in: Claude Video Editing & Remotion Skills
None of the 43 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 43 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 35 |
| Forks | 6 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 59/100 |
| Open Issues | 20 |
| Last Updated | 2026-11-12 |
| Created | 2026-09-15 |
| Platforms | claude-code, codex, mcp, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~18k |
Open-source, local-first video editor your AI agent can drive over MCP (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor). Windows · macOS · Linux. The AI makes the cut; you finish it on the same timeline.
Looking for a CutVoke alternative? If you're comparing CutVoke with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Guardrailed video editing MCP server for AI agents. FFmpeg, Hyperframes, repurposing tools, Python client, and
A modern desktop application for managing Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers across multiple AI agents
Type a movie name and get a fan edit: a captioned speech cut, then a montage cut to the beat.
Edit Videos and Design Images with Claude code or Codex
Governance gateway for AI agents — bounded, auditable, session-aware control with MCP proxy, shell proxy & HTT
Polymcp provides a simple and efficient way to interact with MCP servers using custom agents
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 43 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: