firefox-devtools-mcp — security grade SAFE, quality 74/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 74/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by freema · MCP Server · ★ 72

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is firefox-devtools-mcp safe to install? View the security audit →

About firefox-devtools-mcp

Firefox DevTools MCP Model Context Protocol server for automating Firefox via WebDriver BiDi (through Selenium WebDriver). Works with Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Cline and other MCP clients. Repository: https://github.com/mozilla/firefox-devtools-mcp Note: This MCP server requires a local Firefox browser installation and cannot run on cloud hosting services like glama.ai. Use to run locally, or use Docker with the provided Dockerfile. Security Browser MCP servers carry inherent risks. A few key practices: Use a dedicated Firefox profile. Never run the server against your regular profile — the agent has access to whate

claude-codefirefoxmcpmcp-server

Quick Facts

Stars72
Forks18
LanguageTypeScript
CategoryMCP Server
LicenseMIT
Quality Score73.98910864685/100
Open Issues1
Last Updated2026-03-17
Created2025-10-08
Platformsbrowser, claude-code, mcp, node
Est. Tokens~45k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with firefox-devtools-mcp for enhanced workflows:

firefox-devtools-mcp alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a firefox-devtools-mcp alternative? If you're comparing firefox-devtools-mcp with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • chrome-devtools-mcp by benjaminr · ⭐ 309

    An MCP Server for Chrome DevTools, following the Chrome DevTools Protocol. Integrates with Claude Desktop and

  • mcp-claude-code by SDGLBL · ⭐ 305

    MCP implementation of Claude Code capabilities and more

  • claude-historian-mcp by Vvkmnn · ⭐ 178

    📜 An MCP server for conversation history search and retrieval in Claude Code

  • browser-control-mcp by eyalzh · ⭐ 317

    MCP server paired with a browser extension that enables AI agents to control the user's browser.

  • deepcontext-mcp by Wildcard-Official · ⭐ 278

    DeepContext is an MCP server that adds symbol-aware semantic search to Claude Code, Codex CLI, and other agent

  • claude-code-teams-mcp by cs50victor · ⭐ 283

    use claude code's agent teams orchestraction with any harness

More MCP Server Tools

Explore other popular mcp server tools:

View all MCP Server tools →

Popular TypeScript Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is firefox-devtools-mcp?

firefox-devtools-mcp is Model Context Protocol server for Firefox DevTools - enables AI assistants to inspect and control Firefox browser through the Remote Debugging Protocol. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 72 GitHub stars.

What programming language is firefox-devtools-mcp written in?

firefox-devtools-mcp is primarily written in TypeScript. It covers topics such as claude-code, firefox, mcp.

How do I install or use firefox-devtools-mcp?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the firefox-devtools-mcp GitHub repository at github.com/freema/firefox-devtools-mcp. The project has 72 stars and 18 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does firefox-devtools-mcp use?

firefox-devtools-mcp is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to firefox-devtools-mcp?

The top alternatives to firefox-devtools-mcp on Agent Skills Hub include chrome-devtools-mcp, mcp-claude-code, claude-historian-mcp. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse MCP Server tools