by fuxicodex · MCP Server · ★ 3.4k
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 3,363 |
| Forks | 227 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | MCP Server |
| Quality Score | 71/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-29 |
| Created | 2026-08-04 |
| Platforms | cli, mcp, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~17k |
FuXi English | 简体中文 An AI coding agent that lives in your terminal. Codename YiHuaKaiTian — "one stroke opens the heavens." FuXi is a fast, self-contained AI developer terminal: read code, edit files, run commands, and drive tools from a rich TUI, with cost-aware routing across many LLM providers and automatic failover. One static binary, no runtime dependencies.
These tools work well together with Fuxi for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a Fuxi alternative? If you're comparing Fuxi with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Terminal session manager for AI coding agents. One TUI for Claude, Gemini, OpenCode, Codex, and more.
Open source AI coding agent. Designed for large projects and real world tasks.
A Go framework for building production agent systems with graph workflows, tools, memory, A2A, AG-UI, MCP, eva
Ultimate Context Engineering Infrastructure, starting from MCPs and Integrations
Shell and coding agent on mcp clients
Agent OS: the agent gets smarter on its own. We just hold the line: Interview-gated, staged evaluation, budget
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: