No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
by garrytan · Codex Skill · ★ 60
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
🔒 Is openclaw safe to install? View the security audit →
🦞 OpenClaw — Personal AI Assistant EXFOLIATE! EXFOLIATE! OpenClaw is a personal AI assistant you run on your own devices. It answers you on the channels you already use. It can speak and listen on macOS/iOS/Android, and can render a live Canvas you control. The Gateway is just the control plane — the product is the assistant.
| Stars | 60 |
| Forks | 11 |
| Category | Codex Skill |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 60.5109426441569/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-04-20 |
| Created | 2026-04-18 |
| Est. Tokens | ~28k |
Looking for a openclaw alternative? If you're comparing openclaw with other codex skill tools, these 1 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
A Codex/Claude skill that maintains per-repo operating theory documents.
Explore other popular codex skill tools:
openclaw is Your own personal AI assistant. Any OS. Any Platform. The lobster way. 🦞. It is categorized as a Codex Skill with 60 GitHub stars.
You can find installation instructions and usage details in the openclaw GitHub repository at github.com/garrytan/openclaw. The project has 60 stars and 11 forks, indicating an active community.
openclaw is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.
The top alternatives to openclaw on Agent Skills Hub include theorist. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: