by get-tmonier · MCP Server · ★ 51
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 51 |
| Forks | 3 |
| Language | Rust |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 62/100 |
| Open Issues | 4 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-01 |
| Created | 2026-04-17 |
| Platforms | claude-code, cli, mcp, rust |
| Est. Tokens | ~25k |
Lint the rules you never wrote down. AI writes the code. argot harnesses it with the one thing that can’t hallucinate: your repo’s own history. Statistics, not a second LLM. 100% local. It surfaces the divergence — you decide what to accept.
Looking for a argot alternative? If you're comparing argot with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
The code quality toolkit for the agentic AI era. Find dead code, clones, and scaffolding across 15 languages.
CLI tool that generates commit messages from git changes, reviews code for quality issues, and provides debugg
Give git-like & traceable memory to OpenClaw and any coding agents. By https://memov.ai/ aka Entire CLI for ev
Open source AI coding platform with Web IDE, multi-agent system, 37+ tools, MCP protocol. MIT licensed.
AI-powered code quality analysis using MCP to help AI assistants review code more effectively. Analyze git cha
Production-grade GitLab MCP server with 86 tools — full GitLab control from any AI agent (Claude, Cursor, Zed)
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: