codeburn — security grade SAFE, quality 73/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 73/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by getagentseal · Codex Skill · ★ 11.2k

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is codeburn safe to install? View the security audit →

About codeburn

CodeBurn See where your AI coding tokens go. By task type, tool, model, MCP server, and project. Supports Claude Code, Codex (OpenAI), Cursor, OpenCode, Pi, and GitHub Copilot with a provider plugin system. Tracks one-shot success rate per activity type so you can se

ai-codingclaude-codeclicodexcost-trackingcursor-idedeveloper-toolsmenubarobservabilityterminal-ui

Quick Facts

Stars11,179
Forks853
LanguageTypeScript
CategoryCodex Skill
LicenseMIT
Quality Score72.5180105551975/100
Open Issues45
Last Updated2026-09-23
Created2026-04-13
Platformsbrowser, claude-code, cli, codex, gemini, node
Est. Tokens~18k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with codeburn for enhanced workflows:

  • codeburn — semantic(1.00)+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (75%)
  • manifest — semantic(0.20)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (61%)
  • cli-continues — semantic(0.25)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (59%)
  • superset — semantic(0.21)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (57%)
  • collab-public — semantic(0.20)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (57%)

codeburn alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a codeburn alternative? If you're comparing codeburn with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • codeburn by AgentSeal · ⭐ 2.7k

    See where your AI coding tokens go. Interactive TUI dashboard for Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor cost observab

  • herdr by ogulcancelik · ⭐ 22.3k

    agent multiplexer that lives in your terminal.

  • superset by superset-sh · ⭐ 14.5k

    Superset is an agentic IDE to orchestrate 100+ coding agents in parallel. Run any agent with your own subscrip

  • tokscale by junhoyeo · ⭐ 5.5k

    🛰️ Track token usage across AI coding agents from your terminal. 🏅 Global leaderboard with trillions of toke

  • claude-devtools by matt1398 · ⭐ 3.9k

    The missing DevTools for Claude Code — inspect session logs, tool calls, token usage, subagents, and context w

  • pro-workflow by rohitg00 · ⭐ 2.8k

    Claude Code learns from your corrections: self-correcting memory that compounds over 50+ sessions. Context eng

More Codex Skill Tools

Explore other popular codex skill tools:

View all Codex Skill tools →

Popular TypeScript Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is codeburn?

codeburn is Free, local tool to track AI coding token usage and cost across 37 tools and agents (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Gemini and more), by model, project, and task. npx codeburn. It is categorized as a Codex Skill with 11.2k GitHub stars.

What programming language is codeburn written in?

codeburn is primarily written in TypeScript. It covers topics such as ai-coding, claude-code, cli.

How do I install or use codeburn?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the codeburn GitHub repository at github.com/getagentseal/codeburn. The project has 11.2k stars and 853 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does codeburn use?

codeburn is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to codeburn?

The top alternatives to codeburn on Agent Skills Hub include codeburn, herdr, superset. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Codex Skill tools