by getsynkora · MCP Server · ★ 50
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 50 |
| Forks | 8 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 67/100 |
| Open Issues | 4 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-24 |
| Created | 2026-03-22 |
| Platforms | claude-code, gemini, mcp, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~23k |
Synkora The open-source AI agent platfo
Looking for a synkora-ai alternative? If you're comparing synkora-ai with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
The OpenAPI-MCP proxy translates OpenAPI specs into MCP tools, enabling AI agents to access external APIs with
[archived] c4 GenAI Suite
Turn topics, links, and files into AI-generated research notebooks — summarize, explore, and ask anything.
AI-powered text compression library for RAG systems and API calls. Reduce token usage by up to 50-60% while pr
Simple orchestration for AI Agents built around Vercel's streamText. Lightweight alternative to LangGraph for
Turn feature specs into merged PRs with a self-supervising swarm of coding agents — parallel execution, isolat
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: