TraceWeave — security grade SAFE, quality 70/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 70/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by gokeshenzhen · MCP Server · ★ 112

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is TraceWeave safe to install? View the security audit →

About TraceWeave

🐙 TraceWeave English · 简体中文 MCP server for simulation-failure debug through log parsing and waveform analysis Waveform + log root-cause MCP — stop debugging by hand, use TraceWeave. What sets TraceWeave apart: when a Verdi license is available it engages KDB/NPI for accurate cross-hierarchy driver / load / connectivity analysis; without a license it still locates issues via the built-in Static backend, log parsing, and VCD/FSDB waveform reads. It supports driver backtracking, load/fanout lookup, value-at-time queries, cycle-aligned sampling, arbit

chip-verificationedafsdbhardware-verificationllm-toolsmcpmcp-servermodel-context-protocolpyslangroot-cause-analysis

Quick Facts

Stars112
Forks29
LanguagePython
CategoryMCP Server
LicenseMIT
Quality Score69.7743365565889/100
Open Issues1
Last Updated2026-09-19
Created2026-02-27
Platformsmcp, python
Est. Tokens~21k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with TraceWeave for enhanced workflows:

  • InsightFlow — semantic(0.17)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (51%)

TraceWeave alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a TraceWeave alternative? If you're comparing TraceWeave with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • wave-mcp by Tencent · ⭐ 199

    Open-source, license-free MCP server for RTL waveform debug: reads FST waveforms (VCD/FSDB auto-convert) plus

  • vivado-mcp by mapleleavessssssss-wq · ⭐ 132

    Vivado MCP server — 让 Claude Code / Cursor / Codex 驱动本地 FPGA 全流程。30 个精选工具、8 个证据驱动 Prompt、doctor 环境自检、GUI/Tcl/a

  • roam-code by Cranot · ⭐ 518

    Local codebase intelligence CLI + MCP server for AI coding agents: SQLite code graph, 28 languages, 287 comman

  • claude-prompts by minipuft · ⭐ 182

    MCP server for reusable prompt templates, multi-step workflow chains, and quality gates — compose agentic work

  • gopher-mcp by GopherSecurity · ⭐ 147

    C++ MCP SDK - build Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers and clients in C++ / CPP. Enterprise-grade security,

  • oxylabs-mcp by oxylabs · ⭐ 104

    Official Oxylabs MCP integration

More MCP Server Tools

Explore other popular mcp server tools:

View all MCP Server tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is TraceWeave?

TraceWeave is Open-source, evidence-driven MCP server for RTL simulation debugging: correlate VCS/Xcelium logs, VCD/FSDB waveforms, SystemVerilog/UVM source, hierarchy, and connectivity to trace failures to root ca. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 112 GitHub stars.

What programming language is TraceWeave written in?

TraceWeave is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as chip-verification, eda, fsdb.

How do I install or use TraceWeave?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the TraceWeave GitHub repository at github.com/gokeshenzhen/TraceWeave. The project has 112 stars and 29 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does TraceWeave use?

TraceWeave is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to TraceWeave?

The top alternatives to TraceWeave on Agent Skills Hub include wave-mcp, vivado-mcp, roam-code. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse MCP Server tools