loki-mcp — security grade SAFE, quality 75/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 75/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by grafana · MCP Server · ★ 168

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is loki-mcp safe to install? View the security audit →

About loki-mcp

Loki MCP Server A Go-based server implementation for the Model Context Protocol (MCP) with Grafana Loki integration. Getting Started Prerequisites Go 1.16 or higher Building and Running Build and run the server: Or run directly with Go: The server communicates using stdin/stdout and SSE following the Model Context Protocol (MCP). This makes it suitable for use with Claude Desktop and other MCP-compatible clients. Project Structure MCP Server The Loki MCP Server implements the Model Context Protocol (MCP) and provides the following tools: Loki Query Tool The tool allows you to query Grafana Loki log data: Required parameters: : LogQL query string Optional parameters: : The Loki server URL (default: from LOKIURL environment variable or http://localhost:3100) : Start time for the query (default: 1h

agentic-aiagentic-workflowgolanggrafanalokimcpmcp-server

Quick Facts

Stars168
Forks37
LanguageGo
CategoryMCP Server
Quality Score74.9004007693485/100
Open Issues28
Last Updated2026-09-04
Created2025-04-10
Platformsgo, mcp
Est. Tokens~18k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with loki-mcp for enhanced workflows:

  • godoctor — semantic(0.38)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (58%)
  • Agenvoy — semantic(0.30)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (56%)
  • wardgate — semantic(0.23)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (53%)

loki-mcp alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a loki-mcp alternative? If you're comparing loki-mcp with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • concierge by concierge-hq · ⭐ 531

    🚀 Universal SDK for building next-gen MCP servers

  • vibe-check-mcp-server by PV-Bhat · ⭐ 502

    Vibe Check is a tool that provides mentor-like feedback to AI Agents, preventing tunnel-vision, over-engineeri

  • AgenticGoKit by AgenticGoKit · ⭐ 179

    Open-source Agentic AI framework in Go for building, orchestrating, and deploying intelligent agents. LLM-agno

  • yokai by ankorstore · ⭐ 839

    Simple, modular, and observable Go framework for backend applications.

  • mcp-client-for-ollama by jonigl · ⭐ 827

    Harness the power of local LLMs with this TUI MCP Client for Ollama. Featuring all core MCP primitives (tools,

  • context-space by context-space · ⭐ 814

    Ultimate Context Engineering Infrastructure, starting from MCPs and Integrations

More MCP Server Tools

Explore other popular mcp server tools:

View all MCP Server tools →

Popular Go Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is loki-mcp?

loki-mcp is An MCP ( Model Context Protocol ) Server for Grafana Loki. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 168 GitHub stars.

What programming language is loki-mcp written in?

loki-mcp is primarily written in Go. It covers topics such as agentic-ai, agentic-workflow, golang.

How do I install or use loki-mcp?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the loki-mcp GitHub repository at github.com/grafana/loki-mcp. The project has 168 stars and 37 forks, indicating an active community.

What are the best alternatives to loki-mcp?

The top alternatives to loki-mcp on Agent Skills Hub include concierge, vibe-check-mcp-server, AgenticGoKit. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse MCP Server tools