operational-ontology — security grade SAFE, quality 66/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 66/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by gura105 · MCP Server · ★ 171

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is operational-ontology safe to install? View the security audit →

About operational-ontology

English | 日本語 Operational Ontology An operational ontology is a shared domain model built on top of the data of systems you don't own — objects, links, and actions — where reads traverse the model and writes are gated by actions that carry business rules, are audited, and propagate back to the systems of record that own the state they change. A semantic layer lets you read your business. An operational ontology lets you run it. Palantir Foundry's Ontology is one implementation of this pattern. This repository is another: a minimal reference implementation, small enough to read in one sitting. It exists to make the definition precise and runnable; it is not a framework. Fork it and reuse the ideas. Quickstart

ai-agentsdomain-modelingmcpontologyoperational-ontologypalantir-foundrytypescript

Quick Facts

Stars171
Forks20
LanguageTypeScript
CategoryMCP Server
LicenseMIT
Quality Score65.9881581763626/100
Last Updated2026-10-02
Created2026-07-18
Platformsmcp, node
Est. Tokens~22k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with operational-ontology for enhanced workflows:

  • foundry — semantic(0.17)+complementary+same_lang+shared_platform (46%)

operational-ontology alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a operational-ontology alternative? If you're comparing operational-ontology with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • claude-swarm by cj-vana · ⭐ 115

    MCP server for orchestrating parallel Claude Code worker swarms with protocol-based behavioral governance, per

  • claude-emporium by Vvkmnn · ⭐ 82

    🏛 [UNDER CONSTRUCTION] A (roman) claude plugin marketplace

  • objectstack by objectstack-ai · ⭐ 68

    Apps small enough for AI to hold whole. ObjectStack turns the whole app — data model, UI, workflows, permissio

  • golf by golf-mcp · ⭐ 840

    Production-Ready MCP Server Framework • Build, deploy & scale secure AI agent infrastructure • Includes Auth,

  • memorix by AVIDS2 · ⭐ 825

    Open-source cross-agent memory layer for coding agents via MCP. Compatible with Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Wi

  • Wax by christopherkarani · ⭐ 801

    Shared Single-file memory layer for all your agents, sub mili-second RAG over text, photo and video on Apple S

More MCP Server Tools

Explore other popular mcp server tools:

View all MCP Server tools →

Popular TypeScript Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is operational-ontology?

operational-ontology is A minimal, readable reference implementation of the Operational Ontology pattern. Palantir Foundry is one implementation; this is the concept, minimized.. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 171 GitHub stars.

What programming language is operational-ontology written in?

operational-ontology is primarily written in TypeScript. It covers topics such as ai-agents, domain-modeling, mcp.

How do I install or use operational-ontology?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the operational-ontology GitHub repository at github.com/gura105/operational-ontology. The project has 171 stars and 20 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does operational-ontology use?

operational-ontology is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to operational-ontology?

The top alternatives to operational-ontology on Agent Skills Hub include claude-swarm, claude-emporium, objectstack. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse MCP Server tools