axon — security grade SAFE, quality 67/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 67/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by harshkedia177 · MCP Server · ★ 798

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is axon safe to install? View the security audit →

About axon

Axon The knowledge graph for your codebase — explore it visually, or let your AI agent query it. Indexes any codebase into a structural knowledge graph — every dependency, call chain, cluster, and execution flow. Explore it through an interactive web dashboard with force-directed graph visualization, or expose it through MCP tools so AI agents get full structural understanding in every tool call. $ axon analyze . Walking files... 142 files found Parsing code... 142/142 Tracing calls... 847 calls resolved Analyzing types... 234 type relationships Detecting communities... 8 clusters found Detecting execution flows... 34 processes found Finding dead code... 12 unreachable symbols Analyzing git history... 18 coupled file pairs Genera

claude-codecode-analysiscode-intelligencedead-code-detectionknowledge-graphmcppythonstatic-analysistree-sittertypescript

Quick Facts

Stars798
Forks124
LanguagePython
CategoryMCP Server
Quality Score66.5446571980264/100
Open Issues33
Last Updated2026-08-03
Created2026-02-21
Platformsclaude-code, cli, mcp, python
Est. Tokens~19k

axon alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a axon alternative? If you're comparing axon with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • Auditor by TheAuditorTool · ⭐ 550

    Release channel for TheAuditor — see blog.theauditortool.com

  • roam-code by Cranot · ⭐ 518

    Local codebase intelligence CLI + MCP server for AI coding agents: SQLite code graph, 28 languages, 287 comman

  • antigravity-workspace-template by study8677 · ⭐ 1.3k

    Give Claude Code, Cursor, Codex CLI a ChatGPT for your codebase. Multi-agent knowledge engine, grounded Q&A wi

  • octocode by Muvon · ⭐ 475

    Structural code intelligence for AI agents — semantic search, knowledge graphs, and a built-in MCP server in o

  • cocoindex-code by cocoindex-io · ⭐ 2.7k

    A super light-weight embedded code search engine CLI (AST based) that just works - improves speed and efficie

  • jcodemunch-mcp by jgravelle · ⭐ 2.7k

    Cut AI token costs 95%+ on code exploration. The leading MCP server for precise, symbol-level GitHub code retr

More MCP Server Tools

Explore other popular mcp server tools:

View all MCP Server tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is axon?

axon is Graph-powered code intelligence engine — indexes codebases into a knowledge graph, exposed via MCP tools for AI agents and a CLI for developers.. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 798 GitHub stars.

What programming language is axon written in?

axon is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as claude-code, code-analysis, code-intelligence.

How do I install or use axon?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the axon GitHub repository at github.com/harshkedia177/axon. The project has 798 stars and 124 forks, indicating an active community.

What are the best alternatives to axon?

The top alternatives to axon on Agent Skills Hub include Auditor, roam-code, antigravity-workspace-template. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse MCP Server tools