by haymon-ai · MCP Server · ★ 32
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 32 |
| Forks | 8 |
| Language | Rust |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 75/100 |
| Open Issues | 11 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-22 |
| Created | 2026-03-14 |
| Platforms | mcp, rust |
| Est. Tokens | ~27k |
Database MCP server for MySQL, MariaDB, PostgreSQL, and SQLite - with builtin PII redaction and write-prevention
These tools work well together with dbmcp for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a dbmcp alternative? If you're comparing dbmcp with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
The agentic server framework.
PostgreSQL extension for vector search, embeddings, and ML, plus NeuronAgent runtime and NeuronMCP server.
Local-first AI memory archive. Import ChatGPT, Claude, and Grok exports, generate semantic embeddings, and sea
🌍 The open-source Wikipedia of AI — 2M+ apps, agents, LLMs & datasets. Updated daily with tools, tutorials &
A universal multi-cloud data MCP Server supporting over 40 types of data source connections, providing secure,
Local-first AI knowledge layer. Extract architecture, query from any AI tool via MCP. Private by architecture.
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: